It’s Not Conspiracy, It’s Politics

Robin’s Book Report #60
A reading list by Robin Kaiser-Schatzlein

-best of?
-new article
-reading list

Best of the year

I’m compiling my year-end best of list, do you have one book/article you loved this year? Let me know and I will include it in my December issue.

Reading list

The Obamanauts

What is the defining achievement of Barack Obama?

Corey Robin (Dissent)

Corey Robin reads the memoirs of Obama administration. What he finds is a bizarre set of similarities.

The Family (Netflix)

This documentary is about a semi-secretive Christian group sometimes called the Family who has successfully worked to influence politics, namely by hosting the National Prayer Breakfast. However, the documentaryxs portrayal of the group as a conspiracy misunderstands how politics works. While the Family is likely doing some illegal work overseas, the Family is engaged in a deliberate, collective effort to change politics, something the left could benefit from itself. What I worry about is that we’ve gotten to the point were any collaborative effort to affect politics seems like a conspiracy.

“Population of One: Living Alone in an Abandoned Ghost Town” (Vice)

I met Eileen when I lived in Milwaukee through her younger sister, who I was roommates with. She was one of those people who immediately treated me like we were close friends. When I left Milwaukee, and then the Midwest entirely, I figured I would meet plenty of other resourceful and kind people like Eileen. I was kind-of wrong! Of course, now she lives in a ghost town in Utah.

“Then WeCame to the EndWeWork’s contradictions by Matthew Zeitlin (n+1)

As we speak, WeWork implodes. For skeptics like me, this always felt like an inevitability. They were a glorified real estate brokerage service, so why/how did they expand so quickly? Short answer: because Saudi Arabia needed a place to launder their oil money. This is a really great article about why WeWork (and other companies like Uber) exist:

“Looking backwards through the telescope, the mega-funding for app-based taxi-cab dispatchers and beer-distributing office subleasers makes more sense as a case of savvy operators creating landing zones for massive flows of cash.”

“If Saudi Arabia wanted to more fully enmesh itself into the global economy, then it had to sign up for the pseudo new-age bullshit on offer from some of its largest companies.”

“And if WeWork is what happens when capital is in the hands of resource-rich autocracies, futurist telecom executives, and cash-rich mature companies, perhaps it can serve as a launching point for thinking about how capital would behave differently under the aegis of democratic control.”

Bee Bread” by Josh Evans (Nordic Food Lab)

I’m curious to try bee bread, the fermented concoction of pollen and honey and/nectar. Anyone got the hook up?

When the Dream of Owning a Home Became a Nightmare”

A federal program to encourage black homeownership in the 1970s ended in a flood of foreclosures.

By Keeanga Yamahtta-Taylor (The New York Times)

The programs designed to boost home ownership for black Americans became a tool to further the oppression of blacks. Expanding lending is not always an answer, and often becomes a problem. Reminds me of microloans, something that is similarly problematic, sucking people into the debt cycle who weren’t previously part of it.

Here’s an interview with the author.

How responsible should we be?

This is a copy of my newsletter. Sign up here

Robin’s Book Report #40
A culture and economics reading list by Robin Kaiser-Schatzlein

Hello everyone,

– Check out an article I wrote about one of my favorite restaurants in NYC.
– I also wrote about the owner of Gladys Jerk Center in Prospect Lefferts Gardens.
– If you have two or three friends who might enjoy this letter, please forward it! I would appreciate it.

The Ultra-Responsibility Issue

In this issue, I am focusing on what I am calling the “ultra-responsible individual.” This is the modern person who is, because they are complete unto themselves, responsible for all their own problems. It was Ayn Rand’s fixation. She said that, “individualism regards man—every man—as an independent, sovereign entity.” You have your rights, of course, but you are essentially your own enterprise, nation, or territory. You must take care of yourself. Sick of government bureaucracy? Well too bad, because now you’ll be your own bureaucracy because you’ll be doing all of the paperwork.

The resurgence of the ultra-responsible individual at the end of the 1970s (q.v. Milton Friedman, Ronald Regan, Gary Becker) at first mainly applied to economics. But the idea caught on and has now spread to all facets of life. Individuals are responsible for obvious expenses, like rent, food, student loan debt, but also for tertiary problems, like use of plastics, climate change, and civil rights.

Today’s issue chronicles how that idea pops up in culture:


“WeWork Tells Employees Meat is Permanently Off the Menu” by Nate Lanxon (Bloomberg)

WeWork no longer compensates employees for meals including meat and won’t serve meat at its summer retreat. Says the co-founder Miguel McKelvey in the memo that announced the plan:

“New research indicates that avoiding meat is one of the biggest things an individual can do to reduce their personal environmental impact, even more than switching to a hybrid car.” [my emphasis]

Another quote from McKelvey the New York Times:

“The headline has been ‘meat-free,’ but this is a much larger effort to develop personal accountability in our team,” [my emphasis]

My question is: When did it become an individual’s responsibility to save the environment? Is it your fault the environment slides toward catastrophe? Of course not. It is the result of actions that groups of people took over the course of centuries. Group problem, group solution.

Groups like governments and corporations should be held responsible for environmental problems, not individuals. That is, WeWork could probably have a much bigger role in stopping climate change if it petitioned its financier, SoftBank, to divest from factory farms or the producers of single-use plastic.

But instead, WeWork bullies their employees into changing themselves. The widespread acceptance of vegetarian/vegan diets makes this an easy sell. But imagine if it were a different, less palatable imposition. As the coverage in the New York Times suggests, this is the same type of corporate initiative that Hobby Lobby took when they restricted their employees’ ability to get birth control. Both companies justify their plan with a similar, vague, undue, and illogical righteousness.

***Another bonus zinger from McKelvey: “I don’t eat meat, but I don’t consider myself a vegetarian,” McKelvey told the Times. “I consider myself to be a ‘reducetarian.’ I try to consume less and be aware of the decisions I’m making. Not just food, but single-use plastics, and fossil fuels and energy.”

Hey, I have an idea, why don’t you shut down your wacky real estate company. That would be the ultimate reduction!***

“More Recycling Won’t Solve Plastic Pollution” by Matt Wilkins (Scientific American)

The subtitle of this article is: “It’s a lie that wasteful consumers cause the problem and that changing our individual habits can fix it” It’s jarring to see the word “lie.” But it’s true: why has it become the individual’s responsibility to solve problems like the over-production of single use plastics? Shouldn’t this be the problem of the corporations that pump them out? As a culture, we are addicted to the idea that individuals should be ultra-responsible for all our problems.

‘Welfare-to-Work’ Has Failed, So New York City Is Trying Something New by Michelle Chen (The Nation)

In 2014, New York City scrapped it’s old welfare system. The bygone arrangement required welfare recipients to essentially work for the city (and other organizations) for free. Critics said this was tantamount to slavery. This arrangement grew out of the ultimate instantiation of America’s fuck-off-you’re-on-your-own-now ethos: the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act, signed into law by Bill Clinton.

So, anyways, the old work requirement went by the wayside. Now the program is five days a week of checking into job training and self-esteem raising classes. Yet the welfare-to-work reforms didn’t end one crucial, insidious element of the welfare system: endless bureaucratic nonsense. To even begin receiving welfare, an individual must endure countless forms and find the time to wait around at welfare offices that are notoriously slow. Even the workers in welfare offices complain about being drowned under tidal waves of paperwork. Personal ultra-responsibility has come to mean enduring endless paperwork yourself. Franz Kafka, by 1915, had already noted the degrading, soul-crushing, mind-bending effects of unending bureaucracy in his posthumous slog The Trial.

So while the draconian ‘work requirement’ is gone in NYC, has the delirious and deleterious attitude of ultra-responsibility been reformed?

“Socialism: Converting Hysterical Misery into Ordinary Unhappiness” by Corey Robin (Jacobin)

I am not a socialist, or going to comment on the recent effusion of media coverage of socialism. But this article asks the important question: Is the ultra-responsibility of modern Americans a time-suck? I.e. does having to buy your own insurance, pay for everything yourself, and do all of your own paperwork make for an insurmountable burden that the wealthy can just buy their way out of? An advantage of social government could be that we would be required to fill out far less paperwork. Maybe this seems like a small thing, but Corey Robin’s argument is that it might allow people to just be ordinarily unhappy, which is a kind of freedom.

Were you forwarded this email? Sign up for the newsletter here.